Skip to content
Dispatch Report

Nepal's election system, explained: why no party has won a majority since 2017

Half the seats are first-past-the-post, the rest proportional. The mix was designed for inclusion. It also produces coalitions.

?

By Anonymous

1 min read

Share:XFacebookWhatsAppEmail
Illustration for: Nepal's election system, explained: why no party has won a majority since 2017
Illustration for: Nepal's election system, explained: why no party has won a majority since 2017Photo: Dispatch Report graphic

Of the 275 seats in the House of Representatives, 165 are won in single-member constituencies and 110 are allocated from party lists in proportion to the national vote. (Election Commission of Nepal)

The list seats carry quotas for women, Dalits, indigenous nationalities, Madhesis and others, which is how the parliament came to look more like the country than its predecessors.

The arithmetic of coalitions

A party can sweep the constituencies and still fall short once the lists are counted. That makes a majority unlikely and a coalition the normal outcome, with the instability that follows when partners fall out.

Comparative indices rate the system's competitiveness well and its governments' stability poorly, which is roughly what the design predicts. (‘Democracy Index 2024’)

References

  1. Democracy Index 2024. Economist Intelligence Unit, 2025. www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2024. Accessed 16 July 2025.

  2. “Election results.” Election Commission of Nepal, 2022, election.gov.np. Accessed 16 July 2025.

Cite this story

Dispatch Report (2025) ‘Nepal's election system, explained: why no party has won a majority since 2017’, 16 July. Available at: https://thedispatchreport.com/article/nepals-election-system-explained-why-no-party-has-won-a-majority-since-2017 (Accessed: 5 October 2026).

The accessed date is today's.

0 comments

Log in to join the discussion.

Create an account

More from Politics