Why remittances still carry Nepal's economy, and what could change that
Money sent home by workers abroad is worth about a quarter of national output. Economists say the dependence is both a cushion and a trap.

Every month, millions of households receive money from a relative working in the Gulf, Malaysia, South Korea or India. Taken together those transfers are one of the largest sources of foreign exchange the country has, larger than exports and tourism combined. [1]
The central bank's monthly bulletin tracks the flow closely, because it is what keeps the current account from tipping into deficit when imports rise. [2]
The cushion and the trap
Remittances pay school fees, clear debts and build houses. They also pay for imports rather than factories, and the labour they represent is working somewhere else. Reports from the IMF describe the pattern across several South Asian economies: stable consumption, weak investment. [3]
The policy question is how to turn a flow into a stock: savings instruments that reach returning workers, credit for the businesses they start, and a jobs market that gives the next cohort a reason to stay.
References
- 1.
Nepal Development Update. World Bank, April 2025.
- 2.
Current Macroeconomic and Financial Situation of Nepal. Nepal Rastra Bank, 2025-03-15.
- 3.
World Economic Outlook. International Monetary Fund, April 2025.
Cite this story
Dispatch Report (2026) ‘Why remittances still carry Nepal's economy, and what could change that’, 16 March. Available at: https://thedispatchreport.com/article/why-remittances-still-carry-nepals-economy-and-what-could-change-that (Accessed: 5 October 2026).



0 comments
Log in to join the discussion.
Create an account